Speeding ahead of the competition
The retailer's speed has conditioned customer behavior: shoppers expect frequently updated designs and know that popular items will be available only for a limited time. As a result, Zara customers visit their stores four times as often as traditional retailers (see below). This loyalty enables Zara to spend less than 0.5% of its sales on advertising, compared with 4% at H&M. It also reduces spending on unsold inventory and markdowns.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54e69/54e69dcf30c6ff1c4c252c2b15b6a17934042607" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7741d/7741d45858b62e9c4c8f590f40f57df662b5b03d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5be68/5be685b7aa24d4e6c7b80a9c2e8fb8b02c330a2f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9da48/9da48b0d3a153d533505e23846e96d540b7f551f" alt=""
of store assortment replaced every two weeks
However, prioritizing speed at scale can be costly. With its nimble operations, Zara spends almost 50% of sales on manufacturing and logistics, while H&M spends around 40%. But because its products satisfy customer preferences and marketing costs are much lower, Zara achieves a higher margin and profit per unit while maintaining a faster inventory turnover (see below).
Despite higher manufacturing costs, Zara achieves a higher profit per unit and faster turnover than its competitors
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea23d/ea23dcd7e0675d3db58b2e7dbac70e15894dc1e5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68357/6835762e916f7700271de735874e431b44e5a372" alt=""